grammarglitchcentral.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the grammarglitchcentral.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host grammarglitchcentral.com. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is GoDaddy.com LLC .

the related websites

urlm.co.uk ukclimbing.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

just another wordpress weblog proofread to catch wording glitches–amusing or not! july 29th, 2016 wording glitches detract from the quality of your message. here are three somewhat amusing examples. each writer could have spotted the glitch by simply reading back through what had been written: whoops #1: in referring to a motorcycle crash last week, a birmingham news reporter stated that two survivors "were airlifted to uab but survived." the implication here, with the word but, would not enhance the reputation of uab emergency medicine. this wording suggests the two people survived in spite of their treatment at uab! it should read this way: after airlift to uab, the two survived. whoops #2: in an article about student loan issues,a birmingham news reporter created this sentence: "large portions of students at these institutions receive federal aid." a portion is a section or a piece of an individual thing. when used in this sentence, this word makes it sound as if portions of students (which ones? arms? legs? brains?) are receiving federal aid. the sentence should read this way so that the writer is referring to groups of students, not chunks of them! large numbers of students at these institutions receive federal aid. whoops #3: the careless caption creator at the birmingham news struck again this week with this interesting description of bill clinton who was waving with his wife at the democratic convention: "…the former president and husband of presumptive democratic nominee hillary clinton…" although the clintons have had their difficulties, they are still very much married. this phrasing makes it sound as if bill clinton is both a former president and a former husband. note also that, when referring to the chief executive of the united states, the word "president" should always be capitalized. the phrase should read this way: … the former president, husband of presumptive democratic nominee hillary clinton… tags: the birmingham news , usage posted in grammar , word usage , wording | no comments » “pokemon go” articles need copy editor july 15th, 2016 the birmingham news must have been in a hurry to rush its pokemon stories to press on wednesday. their copy on page a2 is full of errors. the first glitch is in a headline: "games digital popularity also warping real life" whoops! #1: assuming the headline creator means the digital popularity of pokemon go (one game), this headline needs an apostrophe before the s in "games." it should read this way: game's digital popularity also warping real life." whoops #2: although i am not a pokemon expert (yet), i do know that the phrase "a pokemon" refers to one creature and that them is a plural pronoun referring to more than one of something, like pokemon (plural) in general. consider this sentence" "once you catch a pokemon, you can take them to a gym where they can battle other pokemon." okay, so what pronoun is appropriate for a single captured pokemon? i'm not sure that has been worked out yet–it? she? he? the best solution, for now, is to avoid the pronoun completely, like this: once you catch a pokemon, you can take your captive to a gym for battles with other pokemon. whoops #3: i had to read this sentence a couple times to figure out what the reporter was trying to say. one apostrophe and the correct spelling of than would have solved the confusion: "ar (augmented reality), as its known, is different that virtual reality in which a completely computer-generated world is created." it should read this way: ar, as it's known, is different than virtual reality in which a completely computer-generated world is created. whoops #4: subject/verb agreement is the crime in this sentence. permissions is plural, but the reporter chooses the singular verb means to go with it: the permissions, according to engadget, means niantic has access to your google drive docs, search history, private google photos and other items tied to your account." for grammatically correct agreement, the sentence should read this way: the permissions, according to engadget, mean niantic has access to your google drive docs,…. whoops #5: the reporter of the side story made the correct choice with it's (it + is) but failed to recognize that the second its (correctly possessive) refers to the plural word people. "niantic issued a statement assuring people it's not accessing its personal information and will only have access to a person's google user id and password." the problem here is that the use of its makes it sound as if niantic is not accessing niantic's personal information, but they are referring to the people's personal information. it should read this way: niantic issued a statement assuring people it's not accessing their personal information and will only have access to people's user ids and passwords. whew! and all those glitches appeared on one page. tags: agreement , apostrophe , grammar , punctuation , spelling , the birmingham news posted in apostrophe , grammar , pronouns , spelling , subject/verb agreement , word usage | no comments » countables and uncountables (number or amount? fewer or less?) may 31st, 2016 one of my readers pointed out recently that distinguishing between lump sum items (laundry, money, salt) and items that can be counted (dirty shirts, dollar bills, grains of salt) is referred to in esl (english as a second language) classes as "countables" and "uncountables." remembering that phrasing can be a big help when you are not sure whether to use amount or number. here is an example from a recent news article: "investigators were following up what they described as an 'overwhelming' amount of tips, but no one had been arrested." whoops! tips can be counted (as every restaurant server knows). therefore, the correct choice is number, not amount. the sentence should read this way: investigators were following up what they described as an "overwhelming" number of tips, but no one had been arrested. the same concept is true with fewer and less. here is another example from a recent news article: "this will ultimately lead to less medicaid providers in the state." whoops again! providers can be counted, so the correct choice should be fewer: this will ultimately lead to fewer medicaid providers in the state." vielen dank, schorschi! tags: adjectives and adverbs posted in adjectives and adverbs , grammar | no comments » verb agreement: are and enjoys won’t work together. may 13th, 2016 regular reader joe c. sent along this course synopsis from a lifelong learning catalog. "i found it ironic that the man who would be teaching "poetry: reading, creating and critiquing" would make such a classic grammatical error in his synopsis." i agree. in the first part of the sentence, who refers back to persons (plural), so the first part works–persons who are actively writing poetry, but in the second part, who still refers to persons (plural), so the verb enjoys (singular with an s) does not work. the sentence should read this way: this course is intended for persons who are actively writing poetry or who simply enjoy reading poetry for its own sake. note to regular readers: don't forget to check for frequent grammar glitches on facebook. if you submit a friend request to on facebook, you can receive notices of new posts that will help you improve your writing. tags: agreement posted in grammar , subject/verb agreement | 2 comments » agreement errors–again! march 26th, 2016 for those of you who struggle to use subject/verb agreement correctly in your writing, here are two birmingham news examples of how it should not be done: #1: from an article about spring break issues with beaches in alabama: the comments from the two mayors comes amid social buzz about photos showing garbage strewn on gulf shores' beaches and gatherings of college students moving about. whoops! the subject of this sentence is comments (plural), but the writer chose the verb comes (singular). the sentence should read this way: the comments from t

URL analysis for grammarglitchcentral.com

http://grammarglitchcentral.com/2011/07/remember-when-to-use-ly-at-the-end-of-a-word/comment-page-1/#comment-965493
http://grammarglitchcentral.com/2016/03/agreement-errors-again/
http://grammarglitchcentral.com/2015/11/one-jeopardy-contestant-does-not-they-or-them/#respond
http://grammarglitchcentral.com/category/word-usage/
http://grammarglitchcentral.com/tag/punctuation/
http://grammarglitchcentral.com/2016/07/pokemon-go-articles-need-copy-editor/#respond
http://grammarglitchcentral.com/comments/feed/
http://grammarglitchcentral.com/2016/05/countables-and-uncountables-number-or-amount-fewer-or-less/#respond
http://grammarglitchcentral.com/category/punctuation/
http://grammarglitchcentral.com/2015/11/one-jeopardy-contestant-does-not-they-or-them/
http://grammarglitchcentral.com/2015/10/to-hire-or-not-to-hire-do-i-really-need-an-editor-or-a-proofreader/#respond
http://grammarglitchcentral.com/category/grammarglitches/
http://grammarglitchcentral.com/2016/07/proofread-to-catch-wording-glitches-amusing-or-not/
http://grammarglitchcentral.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/polar-bear-with-melting-ice.jpg
http://grammarglitchcentral.com/2011/07/remember-when-to-use-ly-at-the-end-of-a-word/comment-page-1/#comment-965489

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: GRAMMARGLITCHCENTRAL.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1607301979_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2016-03-24T19:07:33Z
Creation Date: 2010-07-20T04:12:52Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-07-20T04:12:52Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS37.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS38.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2019-08-10T22:04:53Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR GoDaddy.com, LLC

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =grammarglitchcentral.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME grammarglitchcentral.com

  CHANGED 2016-03-24

  CREATED 2010-07-20

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS37.DOMAINCONTROL.COM 97.74.108.19

  NS38.DOMAINCONTROL.COM 173.201.76.19

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .